- Burnaby Beacon
- Posts
- Assembly urges Burnaby to 'do no harm' to future generations
Assembly urges Burnaby to 'do no harm' to future generations
The Burnaby Community Assembly’s report recommends that the city adopt an intergenerational lens for its future plans and ensure 20% of future housing is affordable
Last week, the Beacon reported on participants’ experiences in the Burnaby Community Assembly process. Burnaby is one of a handful of cities actively involving residents in planning the city’s future. Through multiple layers of engagement, the city is trying to form a holistic vision for the next 25 years in Burnaby.
Assembly members gathered for seven Saturdays to discuss Burnaby’s future. Photo: SFU Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue
While the city’s engagement processes have covered a lot of ground on issues such as housing and affordability, it also supported a parallel process through the SFU Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue.
“In 2021, Burnaby became the first known local government in Canada to commission a Community Assembly for its Official Community Plan,” the assembly’s report said.
The Beacon reported on the assembly’s selection process and its members in a previous article.
The Burnaby Community Assembly’s 24 recommendations covered six key areas:
The vision for the future
Housing
Growth, density, and land use part 1: Neighbourhoods, Street Experiences, and Accessibility
Growth, density, and land use part 2: Zoning and Housing Forms
Transportation
Livability
Regarding the city’s vision for the future, the assembly recommendations focused on the impact of the city’s decisions on younger generations.
“The Assembly strongly recommends that the City of Burnaby should adopt an intergenerational lens for decision making, requiring staff to report on potential impacts that will be felt by future generations for all major projects, plans, strategies, policies, and budget decisions,” the report said. “Major decisions and projects in Burnaby should ‘do no harm’ to future generations and should ideally have a positive impact.”
Regarding zoning, the assembly recommended a greater variety of housing options, including low-rise apartments, townhomes, row homes, and other options, and a smoother transition between high-density and low-density areas. It also strongly recommended Burnaby create a target of building 80,000 new housing units by 2050.
Assembly members and chair at an event to launch the assembly’s recommendations at Burnaby City Hall on July 22. From left: Jess Li, Joseph Rzeplinski, Selena Di and Robin Prest.
In addition, it recommends that “30% of new market housing should be rental housing and that the City should meet the Assembly targets for non-market housing.”
For the most part, the Burnaby Community Assembly’s recommendations were more high-level rather than specific recommendations.
For example, regarding transit and pedestrian safety, recommendation 18 states, “The Burnaby Community Assembly strongly recommends that the City review existing foot traffic routes to maximize safety (Vision Zero to eliminate road deaths), and identify ‘high-traffic’ mixed-use routes for better road/sidewalk/lane separation.”
The recommendation does not mention any research or information on the successful implementation of Vision Zero in other parts of the world. Similar to the city’s official transportation plan, Vision Zero is mentioned, but what it entails is not.
In recommendation 23, “The Burnaby Community Assembly recommends more nightlife! Incentivize nightlife business around town centres to be able to socialize without the need to go to neighbouring municipalities.”
Here again, there is no specific information about the type of nightlife, where it would be concentrated, or the community impacts of nightlife venues.
Burnaby Community Assembly members at one of their meetings. Photo: Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue
In contrast, the recommendations go into greater detail regarding subjects such as preserving green spaces, community centres, childcare, and daycare options.
According to the report, all recommendations were approved by 66% or more of the assembly members. Recommendations that are mentioned as “strongly” recommended have an 80% approval rate, while unanimous recommendations received a 95% approval rate.
Once the city forms its official community plan and examines the assembly’s recommendations, the assembly will reconvene in early 2025 to discuss the city’s feedback and the OCP.
“After the City of Burnaby publishes a draft of its Official Community Plan, SFU’s Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue has committed to reconvene representatives from the Assembly to review and provide feedback. The City of Burnaby has also promised to report back publicly on how it used the Assembly’s recommendations, including which ones it has adopted as well as any reasons it can’t or won’t pursue a recommendation,” the assembly report said.
This piece was made possible by the Local Journalism Initiative.
Like what you just read? Do you support local journalism? Help us keep going—and growing.
Sign up for our once a week newsletter, or become an Insider to show your love for local reporters and writers.